On race, the Range and what really matters

Last night, the Daily Show lampooned a McCain spokeswoman who referred to her candidate’s support in “real” Virginia. That quote set off a firestorm on the blogs and cable news shows, but what wasn’t reported as often was that the spokeswoman also referred to other areas being part of “real America.” Among them, western Pennsylvania, northern Wisconsin and the “Iron Range of northern Minnesota.”

Oh, brother. I see where this is going. These are all heavily Democratic areas, but predominantly white and, at some point during this cycle, experts have wrung their hands about these areas collapsing toward the Republicans because of the “race factor.” The big picture here is that the McCain camp has tipped their hand on their final two-week strategy. Race cards … all of ’em. They are going to try to flip Pennsylvania and maybe Minnesota and Wisconsin simply because of racial and cultural discomfort.

MPR’s Mark Zdechlik broadcasts an interesting and sadly accurate story today about race, Obama and the Iron Range in advance of Sen. Hillary Clinton’s visit to Hibbing tonight. (I’ll be there tonight and will report back as soon as I can). Race is the elephant in the room up here. But, then again, so is the economy. Rangers vote pocketbook issues first. At least, they have for the past 60 years. But as I pointed out to Zdechlik (I talked to him after he finished the story) this is not your father’s Democratic ticket. Minnesota DFLers nominated a biracial constitutional law professor and a controversial comedic writer for the top two offices on the ballot, respectively. They were nominated for good reason, but the challenges are no surprise.

McCain and the GOP aim to test the Democratic index here under the veil of gun rights, “sportsman issues,” and “redistribution of wealth.” That was McCain’s line at the last debate and it’s a red herring that Republicans use when they want to divide people up into categories. As Colin Powell pointed out on “Meet the Press” last Sunday, all taxes are redistribution of wealth. The vast majority of Americans receive their tax money back in the form of roads, schools, services and protection. Those that don’t are extremely wealthy, far more wealthy that anyone I know personally planning to vote for John McCain (and yes, I know quite a few people on the other side). But by framing the issue this way, McCain opens an “us vs. them” narrative that allows people to make the “us” related to just about anything they want: age, gender, race, income, you pick ’em. McCain doesn’t need to say it. He just needs to leave the couch out on the roadside with a “Free” sign on it. Someone is going to take that couch and we all know it.

Here on the Iron Range, race is a touchy subject. There are racial attitudes that dominate union halls, bars and gas stations that would offend many. Mostly, though, it’s not hatred so much as it is the Iron Range’s longstanding distrust of outsiders. It’s even harder for the culture to overcome those differences when people look different, which is why a candidate who looks like Barack Obama and has a name like Barack Obama struggled in parts of the Range during the caucuses. But in all honesty, nothing is more important on the Range than the economy, health care, pensions and schools. On all fronts, Obama provides the platform that my a majority of my fellow Range voters want.

That’s why I think McCain’s strategy won’t work. I’ll say probably because I don’t know everything, but I do know that the country is looking for someone new to lead this country and Barack Obama has stuck to his “change” message masterfully. I know sincere conservatives who are backing McCain for sincere reasons, but his campaign has ceded the mantra of bipartisanship and healing to Obama. He’s also ceded the economy as an issue to Obama. That, more than anything, will keep the DFL Iron Range solidly blue, along with Minnesota and most of America … all of it “real.”

Comments

  1. Good post. I had referenced the Pfotenhauer deal in an earlier post. When I drive around (and I drive around the Range a lot) the people who have McCain signs in their yards are people who had Bush signs in their yards or they are people I know are Republicans. I know signs don’t vote. I do know that I haven’t seen a McCain sign pop up in a Democrat’s yard. That doesn’t say anything about how people will vote but I think it does represent the general sentiment and seems to be fairly consistent with past elections. What I do find hilarious about the people with the McCain signs is that they feel they need to put two in their yard. They put one on each side of their property. Its almost like they want it to look like there is more support than there actually is. Kind of like they are wishing it to happen. Anyway, I’ve knocked on doors this year and I have never done that for a Presidential election before. I see Obama volunteers out knocking all of the time. I really haven’t come across any McCain volunteers. Seems to me they may be preaching to the choir up here.

  2. (another anonymous)

    I like the observation about the multiple signs in one yard.

    Here’s another thought. Did you notice that Minnesota is a completely blue state this year? At least from the lawn sign perspective, that is.

    The thought occurred to me when I was driving down Arrowhead road in Duluth the other day. There are a ton of blue signs, but a fair portion are McCain and Pawlenty.

    Not sure if there was a discount on blue ink for signs, or if they think we vote primarily based on our favorite color, or what, but it’s kind of strange.

  3. I think McCain has made blue signs because they want to make themselves look less like Republicans. Anything associated with Republicans has a bad taint this year. The Democratic color is blue the Repubican color is red.

Speak Your Mind

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.