Naked emperor just keeps on chooglin’

As expected, the Iron Range Resources board voted Monday to give Excelsior Energy a sweetheart two-year extension on making any payments on its combined $9.5 million in IRR loans since 2001. Bill Hanna of the Mesabi Daily News is reporting that the vote was 9-1, with Rep. Tom Anzelc (DFL-Balsam Township) the sole “no” vote. This differs from the vote total Tom described to me yesterday afternoon (he said it was a voice vote and that he believed it was 7-3). Here is Hanna’s description of the exchange:

Anzelc proposed that Excelsior Energy make “good-faith” monthly payments on the $1.5 million loan beginning in January.

He found support for his proposal in a “friendly amendment’ by East Range lawmaker/board member Rep. Tom Rukavina, DFL-Virginia, who wanted the payments to begin July 2009, the start of the agency’s new fiscal year.

However, the vast majority of board members said to vote for such a resolution could jeopardize an economic development project that was given birth by the agency in 2001 – at a time when the bottom had fallen out of the Range economy with the closing of the LTV Mining Co. and the loss of 1,400 jobs.

“I don’t want any vote I would make to jeopardize a project that would be good for the area. And this isn’t the first time the board has looked at payment extensions,” said Board Member Sen. Tom Bakk, DFL-Cook.

“I appreciate all the discussion. But this is about fiscal responsibility . We need to be very protective and good stewards of this money,” Anzelc said.


In any event, this confederacy of lawyers, lobbyists and consultants prevailed again with the help of a handful of officials who couldn’t tell a kilowatt from a steak sandwich. Excelsior gets another two years to attempt to build a $2.1 billion power plant that the power industry doesn’t want in order to sell overpriced power to customers who are using less electricity than last year. It doesn’t have permits and probably won’t get them. It doesn’t have a customer and probably won’t get one. It hasn’t reported more than $60,000 in private investment since its inception and probably never will. It bills itself as a “clean coal” project but initial proposals still don’t include carbon capture. They say they’re “sequestration ready” which is like me saying I’m “ready” to date several attractive supermodels at the same time. Good luck! And yet, with a straight face, Hanna reports the following:

After the meeting, Julie Jorgensen, co-CEO and co-president of Excelsior Energy, said her confidence level is high that the $2 billion-plus project will move ahead.

“There is bipartisan agreement that clean coal projects are going to be important to the nation’s energy policy. President-elect Barack Obama has made that clear,” she said.

Yes, jump on the Obama bandwagon, why don’t you. Yes, Obama has supported clean coal plants and will in the future. But even the coal industry knows that these carbon capture plants work best near the mouth of coal mines in areas where you can actually bury the carbon. Excelsior’s Mesaba Energy Project is thousands of miles from coal and thousands of additional miles from the place they’d need to bury carbon. They would need a coal contract (probably with a competitor, who would rake them on the price) and a $1 billion pipeline (that’s just a large number that has been thrown around; it’s probably much more than that) just to function.

This will never happen. That $9.5 million is gone forever. The sooner we admit it and move on the sooner we can focus on Iron Range infrastructure, small businesses, entrepreneurship and education. These people continue to misrepresent the reality of this boondoggle and local media, partly through agenda and partly through pure ignorance, has helped them every step of the way. Now the death of this wasteful project will come during the 2010 election year. (Brilliant, guys … just brilliant). And if someone loses a seat or a governor’s race as a result, I will shed not one single tear.

NOTE: I am Tom Anzelc’s campaign chair and friend. While we do discuss these matters before, sometimes during and always after the fact, I don’t speak for him on this blog. In this case, however, I am proud of Tom’s courage in standing against his friends to protect the people of the Iron Range from pinstriped bandits. My words, not his.

Comments

  1. So where was this 9.5 million dollars spent? Research and Developement? Or did most of it get pocketed by Excelsior Energy cronies under the guise of Lawyers and Lobbyists? How much personal capital has the Excelsior Energy board put into the project? The answers are obvious.

    If I still lived on the Range I would be very mad indeed at even one more cent of taconite money brushing the hands of these slimeballs. Rangers should be able to smell the stink of these Cidiots from miles away. I’m suprised there have been no effigies burned yet.

  2. Does anyone have some info on the cost, funding, and operation of the Laurentian Divide Wind Turbines?

  3. Don’t have the numbers handy, but they’re available. There were several stories when those were announced and when they went up. The key (funding) difference between that and the Mesaba project is that MNPower put up the money first.

  4. I am a member of CAMP and have been protesting this boondoggle for the last 2 1/2 years. All Excelsior has is “spin”. They have nothing to back up what they say. If anything, CAMP has disproved much of what Excelsior claims. It would pollute and destroy the northland beyond recognition. I just wish those who are for it could look beyond “jobs, jobs jobs” and see what it would do to our countryside and wildlife. As far as the jobs, it would only contribute to approx. 97 permanent jobs, which will probably go to people other than Iron Rangers.

  5. I bet a lot of people on the range would love to receive such lenient terms on their loans.

  6. I wish those numbers for the cost, funding, and operation of the Wind Turbines was easily available. If it were such a win-win it would be repeated constantly. Hmmmmm…

    I would also love to see some facts showing “pollute and destroy the northland beyond recognition.” is not just rehtoric.

  7. The issue with wind turbines isn’t the price of the turbines. It’s transmission costs and the fact that you can’t guarantee wind when base load power is needed. The turbines used on the Iron Range are so close to MinnTac as to eliminate the cost of transmission. They are essentially a big off peak power source for a big Minnesota Power customer. The real future of wind will be providing off peak electricity that feeds back into the grid at the site of usage. Small home turbines are actually better policy than big ones with transmission lines … just my opinion, though I like the big ones too when they can replace coal kilowatts on the grid.

  8. If it is Big Energy Company building turbines for Big Mining Company, can we assume the taxpayer didn’t help?

  9. Can we? That is no safe assumption, but I think MP paid the bulk of this on their own as part of their 2020 obligations. There are probably tax credits involved, though.

  10. If anyone has a link to that information, it would be great.
    Thanks!

  11. Was the 9.5 million dollars spent on Research and Developement? Is that a bad thing?

    I think outrage is better aimed at how much welfare Big Ethanol is given.

Speak Your Mind

*

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.