Remembering Iron Range political legend Tom Rukavina

Tom Rukavina (Wikimedia)

Minnesota political firebrand Tom Rukavina died Monday after battling with a form of cancer that forced his retirement from the St. Louis County Board last year. He was 68.

A kinetic force for the working people of the Mesabi Iron Range, Rukavina made his name in the state legislature where his short stature, booming voice and sharp-elbowed sense of humor made him beloved by political friends and foes alike.

I’ll update this post with information about services and other remembrances. Meantime, I’ll republish below a post I wrote when Rukavina retired from the legislature in 2012. Under the circumstances, I can’t improve upon it. I know that he approved of it at the time. I will leave it in the present tense.


(May 11, 2012) [Tom] Rukavina represented his eastern Iron Range district for 26 years. This district, now called 6B, was known as 5A for much of his career. This district includes the city of Virginia where Rukavina grew up and first became involved in local politics, a young father and out-of-work teacher who surprised many by becoming the first Catholic elected to the school board. This district includes more iron mining activity than any other legislative district in the nation, including the state’s largest taconite mine. This district includes Pike Township, where Rukavina helped raise his family in the woods between Virginia and Ely, in a house built by hand, from lumber cut in his own sawmill, from trees he harvested. Ask Tom about this. He will tell you. This is his district. He leaves office by choice.

This is not just the retirement of a senior House DFLer, a past chair of the Higher Ed Committee and one of the most vocal voices of labor issues at the Capitol. Rukavina is a living bridge to a time, a place and a political tradition of one of the most distinct regions in the country: Minnesota’s Mesabi Iron Range. What ends this year is not just one man’s political career, but an era of Iron Range politics.

I wrote this in a post about his run for governor in 2010:

Rukavina’s strategy can be summarized quite simply: populism. Not just any populism, but rarefied, high-fructose, 80 proof cooked-up-from-a-homemade-still-back-in-the-woods populism. Having grown up around an Iron Range political universe in which the Napoleon-sized Rukavina casts the longest shadow, I can tell you that Rukavina is not acting when he talks about this driving the milk truck and sticking up for regular folks. His claims about constituent services are valid; he does an extraordinary job fixing glitches and opening doors for people who might lack political power or notoriety.

Along the same lines I remain in awe anytime I’ve been in public with Rukavina. Perhaps unsurprisingly everyone seems to recognize him, but he also seems to know most people he sees, too. Whether on his side or not, Rukavina retains the ability to spar, joke and converse with almost anyone. He knows people’s names. He knows their parents’ names. Their grandparents’ names. That, in a nutshell, is Iron Range politics and why, regardless of the 2010 outcome, here he will be regarded as a Range political legend.

To many in Minnesota, Rukavina is simply “a character,” the loudest voice in a cacophony of labor Democrats from up nort’ a’ Dulut’. They know him as the street fighter willing to take a liberal message and craft it into a homemade riot club, used liberally. But that’s a short sell. Just this session Rukavina ended up sparring with Rep. Pat Garafalo, a Farmington Republican.

This kind of debate is not unusual for Rukavina (or Garafolo), but the verbal exchange (especially at the 2:30 mark) shows you Rukavina’s style, a combination of brass knuckle punching and invoking three generations of your family history that he’s taken the time to learn about.

Known locally and to many at the Capitol simply as “Ruk” (That’s “Rooook,” not “rook” or “ruck”), Rukavina speaks with the distinct but ethnically ambiguous accent of the Iron Range baby boomer. Those boomers grew up in a post-war era of prosperity won by their parents and the unions that finally gained decent working conditions and wages after WWII. They were the product of an Iron Range society in which the traditions of many diverse ethnic groups merged through marriages and political coalition building. Rukavina’s trademark ability to remember everyone’s ethnic background while being able to work among diverse groups with ease could only have come from growing up at the time he did.

Rukavina served the entirety of his career in an Iron Range emerging from the big economic collapse of the early 1980s. Every year of his service represented a titanic battle to save some part of the Iron Range social compact from decline or political attack. Often he won. Often he lost. Today the Iron Range is less populous, less politically influential and more economically challenged than it was before. Critics might be quick to blame Rukavina for this, but one can only imagine how much worse off the area would be if the schools were less funded, the wages lower. Rukavina spent his career fighting for a good life for people like his kids, who are my age, and thus me, too.

A man of Shakespearean depth, he also bears Shakespearean flaws. He will often bully opponents, especially when circumstances aren’t going his way, and his lack of verbal discipline has gotten him in trouble. In classic Iron Range fashion, his loyalty to friends and family has also put him in situations where there are conflicts of interest. These flaws kept him from rising higher in politics or House leadership. But as I said before, knowing the back story helps. Rukavina rose to prominence in an Iron Range political structure where these flaws were marks of courage, winning votes rather than losing them. In another era, Rukavina likely would have been a governor, or a senator, akin to Huey Long or Floyd B. Olson. Instead, he becomes the most fitting example of a political and cultural tradition that built a nation but went through the wringer as the industrial age bowed to the information age.

I consider it an honor to have run the gamut with Rukavina — having been supported, encouraged, cursed and rebuked by him at various times, for various reasons. That’s really how it is for everyone who knows him. There’s a reason people tend to love or hate Tom. He does not mitigate passion and conviction. He does not modulate. Rukavina navigated a 26-year legislative career expressing himself exactly as he is, for better or worse, consequences be damned. He believes with every ounce of his being in regular people and has endeavored to help them as best he can.

There will not be another like him. Not ever. With his well-earned retirement, those who come next may only hope to develop such earnest passion for the Iron Range and its people as Rukavina demonstrated. Indeed, they must if we are to have any hope of a future here.

I doubt Rukavina is truly done with politics. But his retirement today should rightly be considered a turning point in the tumultuous and fascinating history of Iron Range politics.

I’ll leave you with an Uptake video of Rukavina’s 2010 convention speech from his bid for governor that year, one of his finest.


  1. This man was one of the best people ever to represent The Range and it’s people. I’ve debated with Tommy on just about every issue facing Minnesota/The Range over the past 12 years. Literally hundreds of emails. He NEVER didn’t answer a question…or respond to a comment. We disagreed on most approaches to addressing issues but he earned my highest respect. He could humor, or lecture, me in Finnish, Croatian, Italian or English. I’m blessed/honored to be one of the thousands he called friend. I’ll miss him. 

  2. David Gray says

    Rukavina was a genuine Minnesota character. We don’t have many left…

Speak Your Mind


This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.